Fishing With Dynamite (2019)

Movie Info

Movie Info

Paul Wagner
Run Time
1 hour and 9 minutes
Not Rated

VP Content Ratings

Sex & Nudity
Star Rating
★★★★4.5 out of 5

Relevant Quotes

Those who are kind reward themselves, but the cruel do themselves harm.

Proverbs 11:17
"Truly, the evidence shows over the long term you will do better; your shareholders will do better; your bottom line will do better if you are sensitive to your employees and the environment and your communities and other stakeholders." 

Robert Reich, Author and Professor of Public Polic


Robert Reich is one of many interviewees featured in this documentary about the real purpose of corporations. (c) Aspiration Entertainment

In this documentary, director Paul Wagner clarifies for those of us who are economic dummies the murky subject of capitalism. His film explores the contentious history of American corporate culture. It explores the arguments of two influential theories—stakeholder vs shareholder capitalism. And it does so in an amusing, indeed, entertaining, way.

The title is acted out in animated style via brightly painted wooden figures at the beginning of the film. After a clip of Gordon Gecko from Wall Street pronounces that “Greed is good, a business-suited man flanked by two lackeys approaches a pond. He is smoking a cigar, and the lackeys carry fishing nets. Lighting with his cigar a bundle of sticks of dynamite, he tosses it into the pond. Boom, and hundreds of fish are thrust into the air, some of them landing in the waiting fishnets. The act is repeated several times, each time, more fish caught in the nets. The trio leave, and we see the ruined pond, it and the banks littered with the remains of dead fish.

Following this there is a collage of the huge misdeeds of various corporations such as the Wells Fargo scam; the enormous damage to the wildlife of the Gulf of Mexico caused by the failure of the British Petroleum’s well; the implosion of Enron caused by the chicanery of its leaders, and more. This, the film explains can be traced to the adoption in the 70s of the teaching that the purpose of a corporation is to maximize the profits of its shareholders, a too-narrow view that was not held by those who head the corporations of an earlier era. To illustrate this latter point, the film goes into the details of the founding of the mighty HP corporation by Bill Hewlett and David Packard in 1939 in a garage. Neither of them set out to become rich but to pursue their ideas.

This is followed up by interviews with heads of other companies with extraordinary success stories, their companies referred to as purpose-driven companies (Costco, The Container Store, Whole Foods).

Robert Reich, economist, professor, author, and political commentator and his opposite Arthur Brooks, former president of the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute. Also have their say. Though they disagree on much, they come together in their favorable views of companies that move beyond maximize the profits of just the shareholders (and of course the hugely rewarded CEOs) to companies that care for all of its stakeholder, this latter including the employees, the public, and the sources for their products. Examples of such companies are provided by the interviews with corporate executives from The Container Store (Melissa Reiff and Kip Tindell), Eastman Chemical (Mark Costa), Luke’s Lobster (Luke Holden), Whole Foods (John Mackey and Walter Robb), and Costco Warehouse (Jim Sinegal),and others. Especially of interests to ecologists is he segment in which Luke Holden visits the fishermen who provide his chain with lobsters and observes how they are working to sustain the supply, rather than trawling until they have exhausted the waters of their catch. I was especially interested that Bethany McLean, author of The Smartest Guys in the Room, is included, having relished the documentary based on her book, Enron, The Smartest Guys in the Room several years ago.

Throughout the film a clever wooden contrivance of automatons represents the various components who make up a company’s stakeholders help illustrate the explanations offered by the variety of experts. They all converge on the agreement that capitalism, while exemplified at its worst by such companies as EnRon and BP, can be saved by the adoption of the view of a company driven by its concern for all of its stakeholders. It seems that the promise of the wise authors of Proverbs, though directing their words at individuals, holds true of corporations as well. During the course of the film the observation was made that any pairing of business and ethics was a joke. This film affirms, tracing the argument back to old Adam Smith himself, that business ethics is not an oxymoron. It seems that the promise of the wise authors of Proverbs, though directing their words at individuals, holds true of corporations as well.

This review will be in the December issue of VP along with a set of questions for reflection and/or discussion. If you have found reviews on this site helpful, please consider purchasing a subscription or individual issue in The Store.

Watch on Vimeo and Apple TV

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply