Jewish Threads: Stitching our Spiritual Intentions

We’re in the heart of the Jewish holiday season, which continues with the festival of Sukkot in October. In the midst of family gatherings, Americans think of—crafts. More than half of American homes include a crafter, according to industry groups who track these trends. Drawing and scrapbooking are the first and second most popular crafts in the U.S., but that’s because various forms of needlework are shown as separate market segments. Collectively, needleworkers dominate all other forms of crafts.

ReadTheSpirit asked author Debra Darvick to review a new book from Jewish Lights Publishing about needlecrafts that embody Jewish themes. You may recognize Debra’s name from national magazines, including Good Housekeeping. This autumn, ReadTheSpirit will publish a newly expanded version of Debra’s popular book, This Jewish Life: Stories of Discovery, Connection and Joy. You can follow Debra’s regular columns at her website: www.DebraDarvick.com.

Stitching with Jewish Soul

REVIEW by DEBRA DARVICK

Click the cover to visit the book’s page at Jewish Lights.The subtitle of Diana Drew’s Jewish Threads, A Hands–On Guide to Stitching Spiritual Intention into Jewish Fabric Crafts distinguishes this inspiring book of creative projects from many other such collections. With Jewish Threads in hand, you’re not just making what is useful and decorative, but reaching back into Jewish life and tradition, creating contemporary ritual objects, and reserving a place for yourself, or at least your artistic handiwork, well into the future.

Each of Drew’s chapters begins with a story, ably written by her husband Robert Grayson introducing us to the women and one man from across the country who contributed the designs for each of the 30 projects. For some contributors, creating Jewish art was the flame that ignited their commitment to Jewish observance. For others, creating ritual objects for use during the holidays or Jewish life cycle events was an extension of their already firm Jewish identity and practice. The chapter Celebrating Holidays, in addition to offering more than a dozen ideas for crafts, includes brief but thorough explanations of the holidays linked to each project.

The book’s four chapters are organized around the themes of home, synagogue, Jewish holidays and Jewish life cycles. In addition to patterns for four beautiful wall hangings—quilted, needle pointed or appliquéd—the chapter At Home, also features Barbara’s Felted Grape Purse. Not only does the grape motif hearken back to biblical times, but the craft of felting, we are told, dates back to 6300 BC.E. 

From the chapter In the Synagogue, Lois’s Sefer Placekeepers (bookmarks to be used in a prayerbook) make a novel and fun gift idea, although the process seems quite complicated for so simple an object. Experienced crafters looking to create unique gifts for the holiday gifts or for new baby, Bar/Bat Mitzvah and wedding gifts will have a field day exploring the related chapters. From challah covers to Chanukah wall hangings to beautiful zippered bags to hold a tallit (prayer shawl) and kippah (skullcap) the author offers a wide range of projects for varying levels of skill.

The techniques drawn upon in Jewish Threads include quilting, embroidery, needlepoint, cross stitch, crochet, knitting felting and needle felting and readers would be advised to have at least some skill before attempting any of the projects. This is not a book for absolute beginners. But for those looking for meaningful and satisfying projects that will resonate with Jewish soul—this is the book for you.

Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Brian McLaren on why interfaith peace begins at home

Brian McLaren’s new book is prophetic, as we explained in Part 1 of our coverage. That also means there’s real heat surrounding the book’s launch—at least in some quarters. Clearly, Brian now has legions of fans who follow his books for their inspiration and their fresh ideas. We dug into those ideas in …

HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR INTERVIEW
WITH BRIAN MCLAREN ON
‘WHY DID JESUS, MOSES …”

DAVID: You’ve faced firestorms. It’s got to hurt when some other evangelicals claim that you’re no longer a Christian—or say worse things. As a journalist covering religion in America for nearly 40 years, I can tell that you’re clearly one of the most passionately committed Christian voices, today. So, how does it feel when you sometimes face misguided fire?

BRIAN: It’s always a little hurtful and sad. It’s ironic, too. If a Christian Fundamentalist says I’m not a Christian, I think: Well, I’ve met other Christians—Eastern Orthodox Christians for example—who think that American Fundamentalists aren’t Christians. So, the truth is: Everyone defines their terms in different ways. Some people don’t realize how big the Christian pond truly is.

DAVID: This new book, your first book really focused on interfaith relationships, is likely to fuel more fire, right?

BRIAN: All I can say is that I’m 56 now and I’m glad that I didn’t have to deal with this when I was 26. It would have been devastating then. Now that I’m older, it’s not as hard to deal with this kind of response. What we’re seeing in those responses really is an anxiety within our religious community. When we’re anxious, we immediately guard the doors and gates. We guard them not only because of who might get in—but because of who we fear might get out.

CRIS: CONFLICTED RELIGIOUS IDENTITY SYNDROME

DAVID: I’ve researched this and we can say that you’re the person who has coined the new term CRIS, shorthand for Conflicted Religious Identity Syndrome. That phrase describes people who are, indeed, committed Christians but who find the label “Christian” full of troubling baggage and likely to cause misunderstandings.

BRIAN: It’s funny to see how far that term I started using a year or so ago is spreading. I came up with it to describe what a lot of people are experiencing today. We are Christians, but the term is loaded for so many people—so we wind up going through all these explanations and adding all these adjectives to describe the kind of Christian we are to others.

ANNE RICE FACES THE FIRE

DAVID: In your book, you write about Anne Rice’s turbulent relationship with Christianity. I know that you’ve had some contact with Anne Rice as she began writing her series of Christian books.

BRIAN: I read an early version of her first book about the childhood of Jesus, Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt. I was asked to read the manuscript and see if there were things in the story that might be offensive to Christians from my background. I remember there were two or three things that I thought should be revised. These were things she had picked up from extra-biblical traditions and I just thought they threw up some red flags that she didn’t need to provoke. I recommended she take them out and she was very gracious and hospitable to my suggestions. Writing about Jesus and Christianity was a whole new world for her. I was impressed with her.

DAVID: She’s in your new book because you describe how she has sort of rejected Christianity, or at least she has rejected the power structure of “Christian” leaders who like to beat up on vulnerable people like Rice’s gay friends.

BRIAN: That’s the problem I’m describing. This problem of Conflicted Religious Identity Syndrome really came to a head with Anne Rice, when she said she was quitting Christianity. She announced her change on Facebook. She made it clear she still loves God and believes in Jesus, but she didn’t want to be associated with a community that seemed so hostile toward nonmembers and toward people who didn’t agree on any number of matters.

CRIS: A BROADER INTERFAITH PROBLEM

CLICK THE COVER to jump to the book’s Amazon page.DAVID: OK, so here’s where it gets interesting. CRIS isn’t a problem just for Christians, right? That’s a point you make in your book.

BRIAN: Right. You see this problem in so many forms. I was just talking with some Mormons yesterday and when I raised this point, they laughed. They said they certainly feel this. They see themselves as Christians but many other Christians say they’re not.

DAVID: And, Christians aren’t alone in condemning fellow Christians. I know lots of Muslims and Jews and Native Americans and people of other faiths who publicly reach out across religious boundaries—and other members of their groups condemn them as betraying the core faith. You’re saying we share this problem with people of other faiths.

BRIAN: Yes, that’s one of the most important points in the new book. I don’t think we will achieve greater harmony and understanding among the faiths by minimizing our differences in belief and practice. But one of the things we hold in common is that there are features of our identity and our internal conflicts that we all do experience.

ENCOURAGE YOUR CONGREGATION TO READ NEW VOICES

DAVID: You’re a good friend of Rob Bell, who has followed a similar vocational course. He’s now left his big Midwest pulpit for the independence of life in California and the freedom to preach and write in any way he sees fit. Having recently interviewed Rob and seeing all these similarities in your career paths, let me ask: Are we in an era when our world is more in need of prophets than pastors?

BRIAN: Rob and I have been friends for years and, yes, we are frequently on the phone sharing advice with each other about different things. We both come from very conservative evangelical backgrounds. As pastors, we were growing, thinking human beings who publicly went through changes in our thinking. I read your interview with Rob in ReadTheSpirit and I hope other people read it, too.

We do have examples today where pastors are prophetic, but it usually means that they’re prophetic on behalf of their congregations. All good pastors are trying to bring their congregations along in their ongoing preaching and teaching. I hope that Rob’s books and my books and ReadTheSpirit all are helping pastors. If pastors can encourage people in their congregations to start reading websites like yours and books like the ones we’re writing now, then that puts a pastor in a much better position as a moderator for what the congregation is reading and is discussing. It’s a lot better, as a pastor, to be in the role of advocate and moderator helping your congregation think through the new things they’re reading.

COMING TO TERMS WITH CHRISTIAN HOSTILITY

DAVID: I’ve described this as your first interfaith book, but it’s not like most of the other “interfaith” books on my library shelves. This really is a deep exploration of the barriers that Christians throw up against their neighbors of other faiths.

BRIAN: One of the biggest insights that came to me, as I was researching this book, is the realization that it’s not our differences that are keeping us apart. What’s keeping us apart is something we actually have in common: The way we often try to build our own identity through hostility. Leaders build loyalty among “us” by building hostility toward “them.” It won’t work to simply rush off into interfaith dialogue until we deal with some of the deep work within our own identity. We won’t get far in our relationships with others until we deal with some of the often hidden ways we have defined ourselves through our hostility.

Perhaps we can see this problem more easily in the political campaign going on right now. If you took away hostility toward Democrats, I’m not sure how much substance is left in the Republican Party. And, if you took away hostility toward Republicans, I don’t know how much substance there is in the Democratic Party. The same problem exists in our religious communities.

INTERFAITH PEACEMAKING BEGINS AT HOME

DAVID: That’s a key insight and, when readers actually go through the book, they’ll see that you explore this in detailed ways. You look at liturgy. You look at our missional outreach. You look at the Christian calendar. You get down into the nuts and bolts of parish life. I would describe your message as: There’s almost more danger to our diverse communities in the way we talk amongst ourselves, inside our houses of worship, than what we actually say in public. Or maybe: Interfaith peacemaking begins at home.

BRIAN: Yes, that’s fair to say. Think of it this way: Even if 10 or 15 percent of us are involved in interfaith experiences—or, let’s even say it reaches 25 percent of us who are doing these things—the problem is that leaves 75 percent of us isolated and stoking fires of hostility in our home congregations. Sooner or later, we have to deal with that identity issue.

DAVID: As I read your book, I turned down corners of pages and circled words. The opening half directly addresses the many ways we stoke the fires. Dozens of times, you use words like tension, hostility, conflict, attack, threaten, rivalry and violence. Then, in the second half, when you get into the nuts and bolts of building healthier and more welcoming communities, your chapters are full of terms like benevolence, generous, harmony and unity. Is that a fair way to express the movement between the first and second sections of your book?

BUILDING STRENGTH WITHOUT HOSTILITY

BRIAN: Yes. That’s the challenge I’m asking readers to grapple with in the book. When we build our identity around hostility, it’s a very strong identity. Then, we begin to fear that, if we reduce the hostility, we will weaken our identity. If I say that it matters less to me that you’re Muslim—then does it also matter less to me that I’m Christian? Does it have to be like that?

I think the phrase “spiritual but not religious” is one sign people are giving that they want to end the hostility that they perceive is part of “religion.” We can build a strong and benevolent society—we can choose to do that and pursue it. But the second half of my book really is looking at the obstacles we have to overcome in building a Christian identity within our society that is strong, robust and highly committed—but that achieves this strength without defining itself against people who don’t share our identity.

DAVID: Before we end this, let’s update readers on where you’re based now.

BRIAN: For 24 years, I was a pastor in Maryland just outside of Washington D.C. Then, six-and-a-half years ago I left the pastorate for more time writing and speaking. For a couple of years, I continued to be involved in the church where I was pastor. Then, three-and-a-half years ago we moved here to Florida. I live in southwest Florida in a small town and I go to a small church where I don’t think anyone has read my books. It’s been wonderful to go from the pulpit to being the guy who sits in the fourth row from the back.

DAVID: And what’s next?

BRIAN: The next project looks at the whole church year. I have been working on an outline for 52 sermons and a kind of alternative lectionary that would give people a fresh introduction to the Christian faith. What I’m envisioning now is something that, when it’s finished, will be useful for a single family, or a congregation or even a whole diocese to adopt for a year. Individuals could sit around a table together, once a week, and go through the year together—or a whole region could do it together. Right now, the most important challenge I see is to help people take a fresh look at what it means to be a Christian in our world.

Care to read Part 1 in this coverage of Brian McLaren’s interfaith book?

Want more on Brian McLaren?

OTHER BRIAN McLAREN BOOKS and INTERVIEWS are described in our Brian McLaren Small Group Resources page..

Please, Share this Brian McLaren Resource Page with Friends:

Please, start a conversation with your friends by clicking on the blue-”f” Facebook icons connected to this interview. Or email this interview to a friend using the small envelope-shaped icons.

(Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering spirituality, religion, interfaith and cross-cultural issues.)

Brian McLaren: Why did Jesus, Moses, Mohammed …

Click the cover to visit the book’s Amazon page.Brian McLaren
marks 9/11
with a plea
for a new
‘Generosity’

In his 19th book, the prophetic evangelical author Brian McLaren is publishing his first interfaith book. It’s timed to appear on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that opened and still define this turbulent new century.

As you will read in our interview with McLaren later this week, the best-selling writer argues that this new book is far from the typical appeal for interfaith understanding that other writers are producing these days. While many of those books are noble, he has a different purpose in Why Did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha, and Mohammed Cross the Road? Christian Identity in a Multi-Faith World. While smiling over the old joke in the main title—don’t miss that the book’s real focus lies in the sub-title about “Christian Identity.” This book is a passionate appeal to enrich Christian appreciation of cross-cultural relationships by doing some thorough house cleaning within Christianity itself. In this book, Brian is primarily writing to the Christians who comprise a majority of the American population.

FROM OUR INTERVIEW WITH BRIAN (coming later this week in ReadTheSpirit): Brian says, in answer to a question in the interview …
One of the biggest insights that came to me, as I was researching this book, is the realization that it’s not our differences that are keeping us apart. What’s keeping us apart is something we actually have in common: The way we often try to build our own identity through hostility. Leaders build loyalty among “us” by building hostility toward “them.” It won’t work to simply rush off into interfaith dialogue until we deal with some of the deep work within our own identity. We won’t get far in our relationships with others until we deal with some of the often hidden ways we have defined ourselves through our hostility.

Perhaps we can see this problem more easily in the political campaign going on right now. If you took away hostility toward Democrats, I’m not sure how much substance is left in the Republican Party. And, if you took away hostility toward Republicans, I don’t know how much substance there is in the Democratic Party. The same problem exists in our religious communities.

Read the entire interview with Brian McLaren, later this week.

A Return to Brian McLaren’s ‘Generous Orthodoxy’

Reviewing Brian McLaren’s new book as Editor of ReadTheSpirit, I was struck immediately by the return this book represents to themes that he raised in his 2004 cross-over book: A Generous Orthodoxy: Why I am a missional, evangelical, post-Protestant, liberal/conservative, mystical/poetic, biblical, charismatic/contemplative, Fundamentalist/Calvinist, Anabaptist/Anglican, Methodist, Catholic, Green, incarnational, depressed-yet-hopeful, emergent, unfinished Christian.

In addition to setting a record for longest sub-title on the cover of a spiritual book, Brian staked out the term “Generous” for what he also has described since 2004 as “harmony,” “unity” and “civility.” McLaren urges people to sit down together across a table, to eat together and to begin forming a good-spirited community—rather than flashing doctrinal swords. Such words of wisdom echo what we are hearing from bright young Christian writers like Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, these days.

It was McLaren’s “Generous” book that turned heads nationally among non-evangelicals. As a religion newswriter, at that time based at the Detroit Free Press, “Generous” was the first Brian McLaren book that I actually read cover to cover. It was the first McLaren book that I found my newspaper readers asking me about and telling me that they were reading themselves. McLaren was deliberately making a provocative play on words in selecting “Generous” as his mantra. Evangelicals always have set the high mark among Christians for giving money and sweat equity to missions—they always excel (and even boast) about that kind of “generosity.” But, Brian was calling for us to focus on a distinctly different meaning of that word. He also was chiding his fellow evangelicals to become truly generous.

In continuing to use the term “generous,” McLaren is not talking about drumming up dollars for the collection plate. He’s talking about what other writers today are begining to call “kindness” and “hospitality.” In his new book, he passionately describes a great “Reformulation” he sees possibly unfolding within Christianity—neither a rejection of orthodoxy nor a rejection of the Protestant Reformation—but a rethinking and a renewed appreciation of what core Christian beliefs truly mean in light of God’s diverse world.

McLaren: ‘Could doctrines become healing teachings?’

McLaren writes in the new book: Could it be that our core doctrines are even more wonderful and challenging than we previously imagined, asking us not simply to assent to them in the presence of our fellow assenters, but to practice them in relationships with those who don’t hold them? Could our core doctrines in this way become “healing teachings” intended to diagnose and heal our distorted and hostile identities—restoring a strong and benevolent identity, and unleashing in us a joyful desire to converse and eat with the other? Could our core teachings be shared, not as ultimata (Believe or die!) but as gifts (Here’s how we see things, and here’s what that does for us— )?

McLaren: ‘We must provide lots of support’

This is not an easy task, McLaren argues in the new book. He writes that, if Christians take his challenge seriously, they must face up to problems in traditional forms of liturgy, preaching and missional outreach. Late in the book he writes: Because the cost of embracing a strong and benevolent Christian identity is so high, we must provide lots of support for those who respond—support through fellowship, support through teaching (knowledge) and training (know-how), support through ritual and symbol, support through guided practice and mentoring. But since we are still young and inexperienced in this new identity, we have a long way to go in learning how to provide this support, and each of us must take whatever little we have learned and pass it on to others, even as we look for others who can pass more on to us.

McLaren: ‘What will we discover in that crossing?’

In the final pages, McLaren writes: So, imagine then, Jesus, Moses, the Buddha and Mohammed crossing the road to encounter one another. Imagine us following them. What will we discover together in that crossing? Surely, it will be holy and humbling in that sacred space. Surely there will be joy, grace, and peace. Surely justice, truth and love. We will find hospitality there, not hostility, and friendship, not fear, and it will be good—good for our own well-being, good for the poor and forgotten, good for our grandchildren’s grandchildren, and good even for the birds of the air and the flowers in the meadow and the fish out at sea. “This is very good,” God will say. And we will say, “Amen.”

Read the entire interview with Brian McLaren, later this week.

Please help us to reach a wider audience

We welcome your Emails at [email protected]
We’re also reachable on Twitter, Facebook, AmazonHuffington PostYouTube and other social-networking sites. 
You also can Subscribe to our articles via Email or RSS feed.
Plus, there’s a free Monday morning Planner newsletter you may enjoy.

Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Review: Permanent Revolution shows power of prints

FRF Film on Protest Printmaking
Has Deep Religious Roots

REVIEW BY READTHESPIRIT EDITOR DAVID CRUMM

Click the DVD cover to visit its Amazon page.“Has a work of art ever stopped a bullet?” we are asked in the opening scenes of the fascinating documentary Art is… The Permanent Revolution, newly released on DVD by FRF (First Fun Features). Then, printmaker Sigmund Abeles poses his question another way: “Guernica is an incredible painting but did it stop a single bullet? I’m not sure.” In fact, this thought-provoking film isn’t about the entire range of the fine arts as the title suggests. Manfred Kirchheimer’s documentary focuses specifically on the last 500 years of print making as protest. While that may sound like a very narrow topic, the 82-minute film branches off into religious and spiritual themes at every turn.

REMBRANDT AND REVOLUTION

Were you in the crowds who flocked to see the Rembrandt and the Face of Jesus exhibition that has been touring the U.S. over the past year? The printmakers we meet in The Permanent Revolution open up new perspectives on Rembrandt’s vocation by paying more attention to his prints than to his finished paintings. It’s in the prints, these artists argue, that we see Rembrandt’s most dramatic attempts to turn other-wordly religious figures, such as Jesus and his mother Mary, into real human beings.

ANABAPTISTS AND REVOLUTION

Are you part of the Protestant branch of Christianity? The film points out that the roots of contemporary protest prints extend all the way back to early Anabaptist religious propaganda about the tragic torture of their brothers and sisters by the powerful leaders of Catholic and Protestant churches. (Yes, early Protestants also went after the Anabaptists in a lethal way.) The image above is a typical 16th-century image of an Anabaptist being burned for her “heretical” beliefs as a witch. To this day, these centuries-old images are preserved and shared in Amish and Hutterite communities—among the contemporary descendants of the early Anabaptists.

VIETNAM ANTI-WAR PRINTS

Were you part of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement? One of the central figures in the film is Sigmund Abeles, still working many decades after he created the electrifying prints that were widely seen in anti-war protests in the late 1960s. His “Gifts of America” series of posters, which includes dark American helicopters raining death on Vietnamese villagers is one of the images discussed in the documentary.

ALL LINES SEEM TO LEAD THROUGH THE HOLOCAUST

Are you Jewish? Then you probably are well aware that protesting printmakers were in the thick of the turbulent social movements that culminated in the Nazi conquest in Europe. Among print-making artists, all lines seem to run through the Holocaust. Several examples of this are shown in the documentary. In our own ReadTheSpirit Book, Interfaith Heroes, Volume 1, readers find an inspiring profile of wood engraver Fritz Eichenberg, a Jewish artist who fled Nazi Germany and later became a major figure in Dorothy Day’s Catholic Worker movement in the U.S. In fact, I would argue that even this new documentary was born of the Holocaust. Producer-Director is Manfred Kirchheimer was born in 1931 in Germany and became a transplanted American as a child, when his family fled from the Nazis to safety in the U.S.

If you’re among the millions of Americans who now see the world through digital media—mainly through video these days—this documentary also works on a subversive level. The Permanent Revolution uses our favorite medium of video to turn our attention back to one of the oldest and most powerful forms of communication. Spend a little over an hour with the men and women in The Permanent Revolution, and I guarantee you’ll walk away with a fresh appreciation of black and white prints.

The film also is terrific for sparking small group discussion. But watch out, because this is potent material. The movie is as potent as the prints were when they first were pulled from the presses many decades—and in some cases centuries—ago.

Art is… The Permanent Revolution is available from Amazon.

Please help us to reach a wider audience

We welcome your Emails at [email protected]
We’re also reachable on Twitter, Facebook, AmazonHuffington PostYouTube and other social-networking sites. 
You also can Subscribe to our articles via Email or RSS feed.
Plus, there’s a free Monday morning Planner newsletter you may enjoy.

Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Remembering Vidal Sassoon’s Jewish identity

Vidal Sasson was a “Hairdresser and Trendsetter,” the New York Times proclaimed. More than 1,500 news articles spread across the Web since his death on May 9 at age 84 of leukemia.

The Times reported, in part: For Mr. Sassoon, the cut was the thing—just about the only thing—and he fashioned his clients’ hair into geometric shapes and sharp angles to complement their facial bone structure. … (His hair designs) helped propel the youthful revolution in fashion—and just about everything else—that gripped London and then America and the rest of the world in the 1960s. “He changed the way everyone looked at hair,” Grace Coddington, the creative director of American Vogue, said in an interview. “Before Sassoon, it was all back-combing and lacquer; the whole thing was to make it high and artificial. Suddenly you could put your fingers through your hair!”

Here is all the Times had to say about his Judaism: As a youth, he joined a Jewish organization that battled in the streets with the Mosley-ites, anti-Semitic British fascists who were followers of Oswald Mosley. In 1948, he traveled to Israel and fought in the war for its independence.

Click the cover to visit Jewish Lights.THANKS TO THE PUBLISHERS AT JEWISH LIGHTS for sending us Sassoon’s personal note that appears in the book-length collection, I Am Jewish. In fact, his commitment to Judaism and to combatting anti-Semitism was consderable. He founded the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. For the I Am Jewish book, Sassoon wrote:

I am Jewish, humble yet proud of a heritage that has dignified me even as others have tried to destroy my race. I was twenty years old in 1948 when the Palmach/Haganah accepted me as a soldier in Israel’s War of Independence. The experience changed the course of my life. I am a Jew who believes that, though small in numbers, we have a powerful moral influence on the world, and in the words of Hillel, “If not now, when?” Daniel knew when. It is imperative that we nurture a fidelity of commitment to purpose. What is that purpose? Not just to exist, but to continue to bring to this world actions noble in thought and deed, always in courage, remembering, we are our own final solution.

The excerpt is from I Am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl. © 2005 Dr. Judea and Ruth Pearl. You can find out more about the book by visiting Jewish Lights.

This story published at readthespirit.com, a journal covering religion and cultural diversity.

Remembering poet Adrienne Rich’s art and empathy

Adrienne Rich (at right) in her prime. She loved poetry and she loved people, so it is fitting that this 1980 snapshot of famous writers at a workshop in Austin, Texas, is one of the most widely published photographs of Rich today. At left is the late Caribbean-American poet and activist Audre Lorde (1934-1992). Her early work was praised by Langston Hughes and later she wrote about the importance of recognizing diversity within feminism. In the center of the photo is the near-legendary Meridel Le Sueur (1900-1996) whose rabble-rousing writing in the ‘30s and ‘40s sang the same chorus as Woody Guthrie and John Steinbeck, earning her a blacklisting in the 1950s. Her work was revived by feminists in the 1970s before her own passing. Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.You may not recognize Adrienne Rich’s name, because we don’t sufficiently celebrate our poets in America. But, when she died a few weeks ago, the New York Times called her a “towering” figure both for her art and for her “unswerving progressive vision and a dazzling, empathic ferocity.”

Whatever your political or social assumptions may be, we all meet at ReadTheSpirit around a central commitment to compassion and hospitality toward the people in our communities who we often think of as “the other.” Celebrating our diversity is the path toward building healthier communities. Check out our founding Ten Principles for more on that.

When we discovered that writer Lynne Golodner had saved the text of an unpublished interview with Adrienne Rich, we invited Lynne to share it with our readers. Lynne Meredith Golodner is a widely published poet, journalist and author. (Care to learn more about Lynne’s upcoming books—and perhaps even meet her? See the note at the end of this story.)

A RICH TRADITION:

Reflecting on the art and empathy
of Adrienne Rich

By Lynne Meredith Golodner

CLICK ON the cover to visit this book’s Amazon page. This 1993 volume, at 448 pages, remains one of the most-recommended collections of Rich’s work. This Norton edition contains poems from the 1970s through early 1990s, plus some of her most important prose. Also included are essays about Rich by a dozen other writers, including W.H. Auden and Margaret Atwood.Adrienne Rich died on March 27. She was, for most of her 82 years on Earth, an inspiration, a voice to reckon with, and a voice for many who live on the margins—including Jews, women, feminists and lesbians. For half a century, Rich kept a politically poetic conversation going about equal rights for all people. The mother of three spent the latter part of her life as a proud lesbian. She wrote two dozen books of poetry and more than half a dozen prose tomes. Her poetry sold nearly 800,000 copies, according to her publisher, W.W. Norton & Company.

I met Adrienne Rich in 1995 when I was a green reporter covering Capitol Hill for trade newspapers and the Washington Jewish Week. I scored an hour-long interview with the famous poet before her sold-out reading of Dark Fields of the Republic in a packed church, where a larger-than-life crucifix hovered above her diminutive head on the altar.

She was physically tiny but vocally powerful, having fought for the rights of women, lesbians, writers and Jews for most of the 20th century. It must have been gratifying to see a sea of faces at her reading to promote yet another book of poems in an era when writers of poems often found no audience at all.

My interview was long and rich; I hung on every word. I transcribed my notes and kept them in a file through several states and nearly two decades. Upon hearing of her passing from complications of rheumatoid arthritis, I pulled out those words from two decades ago.

Adrienne Rich founded Bridges: A Journal for Jewish Feminists and Our Friends, but her life’s work focused more on subjects central to the lives of all people, not just Jews or feminists. She was one of the first poets in the 1970s to write openly about being gay. She pushed limits and didn’t shy away from topics others found painful to write about. She paved the way for so many other writers.

Here is the text of our interview …

LYNNE: Has your writing voice matured over the years—become more confident, as you have?

ADRIENNE: Well, you know I published my first book when I was 21 and I might not at that point have even thought of publishing a book except that it had won this prize, the Yale Younger Poets Prize. I had been writing poetry for most of my life because I loved it so much. I was quite guarded. The first poem I ever published, “Storm Warnings,” was about protecting oneself in a world of great tumult and storms and uncontrollable forces. I wrote that poem in 1947, just after the end of World War II and the Holocaust, the nuclear bomb impinging on our consciousness. Young people in my college generation were very well aware that it was now possible to destroy the world and also that six million Jewish lives had been destroyed. My work since then has gone on to tear down the idea of protection and say we have to risk going out unprotected in order to know this world and to know ourselves.

LYNNE: What is your goal, your agenda, when writing?

ADRIENNE: To connect. To connect things that I have felt were disconnected in my life, things that were disconnected in society, in a relationship, in the transactions between the individual and the community.

Adrienne Rich on Poetry in America

Click on the cover to visit Amazon. This 112-page collection of later poems was praised by reviewers. Publishers Weekly said, “Rich’s stark, intimate voice seems to speak for a life lived at once at the margins and at the center.”LYNNE: What is the poet’s role in America? Does the poet have a role today?

ADRIENNE: There are a lot of poets and a lot of different kinds of poets. This is a magnificent time in American poetry, a fact which is not always reflected in the poems that students are reading in schools and it’s not always reflected in the mainstream treatment of poetry. As far as our poetic and literary mainstream is concerned, there’s a terrible kind of apartheid. At the grassroots, there’s never been more people going to poetry readings and reading poems. You find communities of writers all over the country and this isn’t necessarily making news but it’s happening. And it’s contributing to people’s sense of community, to people’s sense of self, to their sense of duty. Poetry renews our sense of what language can be.

LYNNE: What is the writer’s responsibility?

ADRIENNE: Not to sell the people short. Every artist who has some sense of an audience has to come to a point where they decided to do something that’s different, to keep on searching and probing.

Adrienne Rich on
Jewish Feminist Poetry

LYNNE: How do we define Jewish feminist poetry? Poems written by Jews and feminists or something deeper?

ADRIENNE: If you’re a Jew and you write a poem, is it a Jewish poem? Does it have to contain certain vocabulary, allusions, references or values? And then we have to ask, what are Jewish values? There are those values we would like to think are Jewish. It’s a never-ending conversation. (Classifying a genre of writing) limits the reading of the poem. I don’t like to see the reading of a poem proscribed by too much definition. On the other hand, I think it is very interesting to look at writing done by a group of people, in this case women, who share a common heritage. And who also are in rebellion against parts of that heritage. A lot of writing comes out of activism, contemplation, meditation.

It can be useful to say: What is the poetry that Jewish feminism has made possible? Perhaps kinds of poems that women weren’t writing before that, although there is a whole tradition of women writing in Yiddish, who were writing very powerful work, not necessarily feminist work as we would define it today, but with something of that spirit.

LYNNE: Do you think that for some people, Holocaustism has replaced Judaism as religion or identity?

ADRIENNE: This is certainly a question which for me is a big search. It’s a huge question: How do American Jews frame their identity, in terms of the Holocaust or in terms of Israel? And what is it that we need to be doing here and now? On the cusp of a new century, a whole generation born long after the end of World War II and the establishment of Israel.

In some ways, there is a kind of flailing and thrashing of the old that is still with us that is more visible almost than whatever is new. (She references the harsh rhetoric of the right-wing spewed at the late Israeli leader, Yitzhak Rabin.) This is the absolute stunting of tradition, the reduction of a very complicated and rich tradition into nothing but hate. We see it in all religions. That right-wing, doctrinaire, rigid element hanging on for dear life because God forbid literally there are going to be great changes. There have to be changes.

I’m concerned about questions in the American Jewish community, about class and what does it mean that there is now a very distinct and wealthy American Jewish community that is hostile to the Jewish left wing and progressive tradition and to those of us who are trying to work out of that tradition.

LYNNE: How does the voice and intent of Bridges differ from other Jewish publications? How does Bridges distinguish itself and why is it needed in the marketplace?

ADRIENNE: Bridges grew out of our feminist newsletter for the New Jewish Agenda and it grew bigger, attracted more subscribers. We thought there was a place for a Jewish feminist journal, which would see as part of its mission being a player in the multi-ethnic, multi-racial women’s movement and be a connector.

Adrienne Rich on Listening to the Music

LYNNE: What role does religion play in your life?

ADRIENNE: I describe myself as a secular Jew. Secular for me is not just an emptiness; it’s not a void. It’s not the absence of something. It has a very positive content, which has to do with work and love and justice and ethics in this world. With passion. And with a strong desire to see every human being fulfill themselves to the utmost of their capacity and try to create the conditions for that in this world. When I say I’m a secular Jew, it’s a way of saying that I’m most attuned to that hunger for justice which rolls down like mighty waters.

(Adrienne Rich was raised not at all in the Jewish tradition. She attended a Christian girls school, which introduced her to the Bible, and to her Jewish roots. She said her parents were so assimilated that they were determined not to give their daughter a Jewish education. “I saw the price of that isolation from any kind of community and it’s made me tend toward community.”)

LYNNE: In some ways, don’t you think religion and poetry play the same roles? Both are vehicles for people to try to make sense of their worlds, to understand their place in the world?

ADRIENNE: There is something about art, whatever one’s art may be, that if you take it seriously, which doesn’t mean humorlessly, it begins to clarify the world for you in certain ways. It also takes you into much more complicated places, perhaps, than you would have otherwise gone, but that’s important too. And sometimes you do find yourself wandering in the wilderness. And you have visions. And I guess what I feel about art, in particular the art of poetry, is that it connects people in the way that religion can.

I had a fascinating experience in Salt Lake City, where I learned a lot about the Mormons, whom I had never known much about. Somebody took me to see the Mormon Tabernacle, where the choir sings. It’s got such incredible acoustics that you can literally drop a pin and hear it. And they turned on the sound system and there was the Bach chorale being sung by hundreds of voices. And it was amazing. And the woman who was taking me around was a lapsed Mormon and she said, “You know, there are times when I feel very nostalgic for the music.”

And I said to her, “Sometimes I wonder if religions would have lasted as long as they have without music.”

And I was thinking of the High Holy Days. Something I do every year is play a tape of some old cantorial music, wherever I am. And I hear the shofar. And that’s important to me.

Adrienne Rich on a Life’s Work

Click on the cover to visit Amazon. This 180-page later collection of prose was praised by the Booklist reviewer: “Rich deep-reads poetry written in the shadow of AIDS and during tyranny and war in Iraq, and argues that we must all be ‘resistant to dogma.’ For all Rich’s shepherding us toward compassion and solidarity with those who suffer violence and injustice, she never ceases to praise the mystery intrinsic to poetry and art.”LYNNE: Where does Dark Fields of the Republic (a 1995 publication by Rich) compare/fit in the line of books you have published?

ADRIENNE: This book comes out of a succession of books. I began to increasingly feel the need to address the politics of my country, starting around 1980 with the Reagan election. I started to feel a kind of foreboding about the direction this country is taking, not only within itself but around the world. And become more aware of the extraordinary power, military and financial, that can be exerted in the name of the United States.

A lot of poetry I’ve been writing grapples with that. I was writing very consciously as a woman. And a Jew. And a lesbian. And I began to write more and more as a citizen. I began to feel that I’m not simply a marginal person here. I have a right to look at my country and say, “What the Hell is going on here?” Or to look at my country and say, “I am part of this. This is being done in my name. What is my responsibility?”

LYNNE: Tell me about your poem, “Yom Kippur 1984”? (It took a year to complete the poem.)

ADRIENNE: I had just moved to California from the East Coast, and I felt I was leaving all kinds of community behind and really striking out. That whole question of being cut off from one’s community, being forgiven by one’s community, how do we know ourselves to be part of a community if we’re also within that community in some way on the margins?

I was trying to pull all those things together and then ask the very necessary question for a poet, “How can I also have solitude, which I need, in order to do my work?” Does community mean surrendering solitude?

LYNNE: (Rich released early works later in life.) Why release early works now?

ADRIENNE: As you get older and you write more, you find yourself going back to earlier works and thinking, “Yes, I was that person. And I’m not exactly that same person now but I could still say those things.” And I feel very connected now to all of my books.

The very young woman who wrote the poems in A Change of World (1951) was a very different person from me, but she’s in me somewhere, too. It was my late editor’s idea to collect the first six books in one volume, rather than keep them all in print separately. I was very glad of that. It put that part of my life in a place. And now I’m working on the second part.

LYNNE: How do you see the future of poetry?

ADRIENNE: Poetry is becoming an ever more popular art in the best sense. We tend to say popular meaning that which is mass-marketed, but genuinely, grassroots, and it’s multilingual in this country, bilingual, written in Navajo and English, Spanish and English, Vietnamese and English, Yiddish and English. There’s a lot of work being done because we are such a nation of immigrants, trying to bring together the language of the past, the mother tongue and the American vernacular, which can be so many things. A lot of poets are writing for the microphone.

(Rich’s 1995 release was her first accompanied by a cassette tape of her voice reading her poems. She loved the idea that people could be driving down the road, listening to and immersed in her words. A generation before the Kindle, here’s what she said:)

I don’t think poetry will ever stop being on the page…books are so portable. You want your book to stick in your pocket. It’s amazing all the places you see people reading.

That said, poetry is being taken off the page and put back onto the voice.

Read Rich! Here are a few great starting points …

CLICK ON the book covers, above, to visit Amazon. Adrienne Rich’s Poetry and Prose (Norton Critical Editions) is the most complete collection and remains on sale after nearly two decades. We also recommend the more recent Telephone Ringing in the Labyrinth: Poems 2004-2006 and A Human Eye: Essays on Art in Society, 1997-2008

Care for more with Lynne Golodner?

Lynne Golodner is an expert in cross-cultural issues with a specialty in writing about food, faith and family. Her most recent platform is Parenting Without a Map™, an empowering workshop currently touring the country. Her next books are a novel and “Flavors of Faith: Holy Breads”—a tour through the breads that are symbolic in a variety of communities and religions. Both will be published this year by ReadTheSpirit Books. She is founder of Your People LLC, a company known for taking fresh approaches to marketing. She recently published an overview of her ideas in “Stand Out from the Crowd: The Your People Guide to Beside-the-box, Funky, From-the-Heart DIY Marketing, PR & Social Media.”
Care to meet Lynne as a writer? She has a limited number of openings for a writers’ retreat she is organizing for August in Nova Scotia.

Please help us to reach a wider audience

We welcome your Emails at [email protected]
We’re also reachable on Twitter, Facebook, AmazonHuffington PostYouTube and other social-networking sites. 
You also can Subscribe to our articles via Email or RSS feed.
Plus, there’s a free Monday morning Planner newsletter you may enjoy.

Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Recalling Mike Wallace’s tough take on religion, philosophy

Mike Wallace and Harry Reasoner in 1968 with CBS 60 Minutes.For more than half a century, Mike Wallace bought Americans uncompromising reports on influential and often controversial newsmakers around the world. In 1959, Wallace was the first TV reporter to tell the world about the Nation of Islam. In 1964, he conducted the interview in which Malcolm X said, “I probably am a dead man already.”
Wallace was distinguished “as an interrogator of the famous and infamous,” the New York Times said in its obituary when Wallace died on April 7, 2012, at age 93.
Throughout his career, Wallace was drawn toward religious figures in the news, including the Ayatollah Khomeini who Wallace interviewed in 1979. Such famous moments were mentioned throughout the coverage of Wallace’s death—but very little has been reported about Wallace’s own religious background. Many Americans never knew that Wallace came from a Russian-Jewish family whose surname originally was Wallik. His parents already had taken the name Wallace by the time Myron Leon “Mike” Wallace was born in 1918 in Brookline, Mass.

Read the two other related stories, including our fascinating look back at Walter Cronkite taking the CBS anchor chair 50 years ago. And, from Walt Whitman, a remembrance of his famous When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d.

MIKE WALLACE ON HIS JEWISH AND JOURNALISTIC IDENTITIES

Click the cover to visit Jewish Lights.Thanks to our colleagues at Jewish Lights Publishing, we are publishing a first-person reflection that Mike Wallace wrote for a collection of pieces that were produced after the murder of Jewish journalist Daniel Pearl. In that collection, Wallace writes …

Occasionally down the years I’ve winced at being labeled a “self-hating Jew” because my reporting from the Middle East was perceived as tainted by hostility toward Israel. It wasn’t true, of course, but I figured it came with the territory, meaning that I was deemed biased because I reported accurately what was happening on the other side, with the Palestinians.

And it turned out that every once in a while it was helpful to me as a reporter, for the fact that I am Jewish and not in the pocket of the Israelis seemed to appeal to movers and shakers in Cairo and Damascus and Riyadh, who were willing to talk to me on the record with some candor.

I’ve worked the Middle East beat since the l950s, back in the days of Moshe Dayan, Golda Meir, Menachem Begin, Anwar Sadat, Yasir Arafat, Mu‘ammar Gadhafi. My relations with all of them, with the sole exception of Begin, were cordial and straightforward. But when I questioned Begin in a fashion that I thought reasonable and he found belligerent, our conversation was brought to an end by the intervention of Ezer Weizman, his defense minister, who shortly afterward took me for a friendly drink at a nearby bar.

My eyes had first been opened to Israeli/Palestinian realities by two pioneering figures from that part of the world. Back in the fifties, Reuven Dafne, a Romanian Israeli, and Fayez Sayegh, a Palestinian Christian, two friends of mine, gave me a primer course on the complicated subject, for which I remain grateful.

I have long admired the courage and determination of the Israelis and sympathized with their yearning for a secure state. I have similar feelings about the Palestinians. But I’m an American reporter, a Jew who believes in going after facts on the ground, as Daniel Pearl did, and reporting them accurately, let the chips fall where they may.

The excerpt is from I Am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl. © 2005 Dr. Judea and Ruth Pearl. You can find out more about the book by visiting Jewish Lights.

MIKE WALLACE IN HIS PRIME ON A CONTROVERSIAL PHILOSOPHY

Many Mike Wallace video clips have aired since his death, including footage of his interview with Khomeini. Throughout his career, Wallace sought out some of the toughest interviews involving extreme points of view in religion and philosophy. The following three video screens contain, in three segments, the entire half-hour interview Wallace conducted in 1959 with the popular yet controversial novelist Ayn Rand. If you watch all three parts, you will see many of the Wallace trademark interview techniques. (Of course, in later years, Wallace did not light up cigarettes while on the air, as he does here.)

Ayn Rand was a journalist’s worst nightmare. She was infamous as an iron-willed advocate for her philosophy, so strong in her viewpoints that she happily helped Congress with its anti-Communist witch hunts after World War II. She dominated in public appearances. But, here, we see Wallace using some of his trademark techniques to shape the overall interview. At one point, he asks pointedly: “May I interrupt now?” His questions usually were loaded to make important counterpoints. As the exchange unfolds, Wallace raises a series of questions about the basic purpose of faith and philosophy.

CLICK the screens, one by one, to see the three parts of this half-hour exchange. (NOTE: If you don’t see video screens in your version of this story, click here to reload this story in your browser.)

Please help us to reach a wider audience

We welcome your Emails at [email protected]
We’re also reachable on Twitter, Facebook, AmazonHuffington PostYouTube and other social-networking sites. 
You also can Subscribe to our articles via Email or RSS feed.
Plus, there’s a free Monday morning Planner newsletter you may enjoy.

Originally published at readthespirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.